Rico Ballard v. Officer Matthews, et al
| RICO LAMAR BALLARD |
| MATTHEWS, RUFUS LOGAN and TOMMY COFFEE |
| 22-13730 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard failed to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:50 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Returned Mail was received for Attorney McNeill Stokes for Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard. IN RE: Initial Docketing Letter. [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel W. Hamilton for Appellees Tommy Coffee, Rufus Logan and Matthews. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13730] (ECF: Daniel Hamilton) [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Daniel W. Hamilton for Matthews, Rufus Logan and Tommy Coffee. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 12/06/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by McNeill Stokes Rico Lamar Ballard. [22-13730] (ECF: McNeill Stokes) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rico Lamar Ballard. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order Denying appointment of counsel as to Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard was filed on 11/07/2022. Docket Entry 102. [Entered: 11/07/2022 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR***USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 09/07/2022. Docket Entry 91.--[Edited 11/09/2022 by CSG] [Entered: 11/07/2022 11:48 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard on 11/04/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 11/07/2022 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
