Hannah Lowe v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
| HANNAH LOWE |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER |
| 22-13979 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Soc Sec - SSID Title XVI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Appellant's brief is currently due on 01/17/2023. Over the phone 30 day extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Jason P. Bailey for Appellant Hannah Lowe. Appellant's brief is now due on 02/16/2023 as to Appellant Hannah Lowe. Appendix due on 02/23/2023 as to Appellant Hannah Lowe. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kristin M. Rogers for Appellee Social Security Administration, Commissioner. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13979] (ECF: Kristin Rogers) [Entered: 12/21/2022 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kristin M. Rogers for Social Security Administration [22-13979] (ECF: Kristin Rogers) [Entered: 12/20/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Jason P. Bailey for Appellant Hannah Lowe. [22-13979] (ECF: Jason Bailey) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jason P. Bailey for Appellant Hannah Lowe. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13979] (ECF: Jason Bailey) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jason P. Bailey for Hannah Lowe. [22-13979] (ECF: Jason Bailey) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Blake for Commissioner of Social Security [22-13979] (ECF: Richard Blake) [Entered: 12/09/2022 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Hannah Lowe. The appellant's brief is due on or before 01/17/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 12/07/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Hannah Lowe was filed on 12/06/2022. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 12/07/2022 07:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elizabeth Holt for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for Social Security Administration, Commissioner. [22-13979] (ECF: Elizabeth Holt) [Entered: 12/02/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Billingsley for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for Social Security Administration, Commissioner. [22-13979] (ECF: Michael Billingsley) [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Hannah Lowe on 11/28/2022. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis DE 35. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/16/2022 as to Appellant Hannah Lowe. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/30/2022 as to Appellee Social Security Administration, Commissioner [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
