Eric Watkins v. David Session, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIC WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SESSION, WILLIAM VOGT, DAVLIN SESSION, CHIEF OF POLICE, LAUDERHILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF LAUDERHILL
Case Number: 22-14070
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 7, 2023 Eric Watkins v. David Session, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Appellants Motion For Extension of Time is GRANTED. Appellants brief is due forty (40) days from the District Courts ruling on Appellants Motion for leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, with the appendix due seven (7) days from the filing of the brief. [ # 8 ] AJ (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 01/30/2023 02:15 PM]
January 12, 2023 Filing 8 "Motion for extension of time" filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:44 PM]
January 3, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Justin Daniel Luger for Chief of Police, Lauderhill Police Department, City of Lauderhill, David Session, Davlin Session and William Vogt. [22-14070] (ECF: Justin Luger) [Entered: 01/03/2023 11:30 AM]
January 3, 2023 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Anne Reilly Flanigan for Appellees Chief of Police, Lauderhill Police Department, City of Lauderhill, David Session, Davlin Session and William Vogt. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-14070] (ECF: Anne Flanigan) [Entered: 01/03/2023 11:16 AM]
January 3, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Anne Reilly Flanigan for Chief of Police, Lauderhill Police Department, City of Lauderhill, David Session, Davlin Session and William Vogt. [22-14070] (ECF: Anne Flanigan) [Entered: 01/03/2023 11:09 AM]
December 20, 2022 Filing 4 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Eric Watkins. The appellant's brief is due on or before 01/17/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:06 PM]
December 20, 2022 Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Eric Watkins. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:04 PM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Eric Watkins. [Entered: 12/16/2022 10:25 AM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eric Watkins on 12/05/2022. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/22/2022 as to Appellant Eric Watkins. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/05/2023 as to Appellee David Session. [Entered: 12/08/2022 11:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eric Watkins v. David Session, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ERIC WATKINS
Represented By: Eric Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SESSION
Represented By: Anne Reilly Flanigan
Represented By: Justin Daniel Luger
Represented By: Matthew H. Mandel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM VOGT
Represented By: Anne Reilly Flanigan
Represented By: Justin Daniel Luger
Represented By: Matthew H. Mandel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVLIN SESSION
Represented By: Anne Reilly Flanigan
Represented By: Justin Daniel Luger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHIEF OF POLICE, LAUDERHILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Anne Reilly Flanigan
Represented By: Justin Daniel Luger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF LAUDERHILL
Represented By: Anne Reilly Flanigan
Represented By: Justin Daniel Luger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?