Stephen Adderley v. USA
| STEPHEN ADDERLEY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-14075 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Stephen Adderley was filed on 01/12/2023. Docket Entry 8. [Entered: 01/19/2023 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Stephen Adderley. [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 Notice of receipt: Response to Default Letter. as to Appellant Stephen Adderley.. [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Stephen Adderley. [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Stephen Adderley. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 12/27/2022 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for United States Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-14075] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lisa Rubio for USA [22-14075] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 12/09/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Stephen Adderley was filed on 11/21/2022. Docket Entry 3. [Entered: 12/08/2022 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stephen Adderley on 12/07/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/08/2022 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stephen Adderley v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: STEPHEN ADDERLEY | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Adderley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Tobin Rubio |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
