Georgia Department of Community Supervision, et al v. Brandon Cobb, et al
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION |
| BRANDON COBB, MARY HILL and JOSEPH NETTLES |
| 22-90017 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andres Martin Lopez-Delgado for Brandon Cobb and Mary Hill. [22-90017] (ECF: Andres Lopez-Delgado) [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stephanna Szotkowski for Plaintiffs-Respondents Brandon Cobb, Joseph Nettles, and Mary Hill [22-90017] (ECF: Stephanna Szotkowski) [Entered: 11/04/2022 08:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by George Marvin Weaver for Commissioner, Georgia Department of Community Supervision and Georgia Department of Community Supervision. [22-90017] (ECF: George Weaver) [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:24 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-90017] (ECF: George Weaver) [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:09 PM] |
| MISCELLANEOUS CASE DOCKETED. Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 23(f) filed by Petitioners Commissioner, Georgia Department of Community Supervision and Georgia Department of Community Supervision. Served 10/27/2022. [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
