Antonio Davis v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department, et al.
| ANTONIO R. DAVIS |
| FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 22-90020 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: ...Because a notice of appeal mistakenly filed in this Court must be transferred to the district court clerk, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(d), the Clerks Office is directed to TRANSFER this petition, which is construed as a notice of appeal, to the clerk for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for docketing as a notice of appeal and then close this matter.1 After receipt of the notice of appeal, the clerk for the district court will send a copy of the notice of appeal and of the docket entriesand any later docket entriesto the clerk of this Court. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(d)(1). . [ # 1 ]; JP, BCG and RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 01/13/2023 12:25 PM]
|
| Filing 5 No action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 4 ]. The referenced filing from Petitioner Antonio R. Davis is not required. [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Antonio R. Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [22-90020] (ECF: Antonio Davis) [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-90020] (ECF: Antonio Davis) [Entered: 01/04/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Antonio R. Davis. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 01/04/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE DOCKETED. Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Antonio R. Davis. [Entered: 12/19/2022 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Antonio Davis v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANTONIO R. DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Antonio R. Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
