Stephen McDaniel v. Warden
| STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL |
| WARDEN |
| 23-10148 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 No action will be taken on Motion for Leave to File Document Out of Time [ # 11 ] from Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel because your CIP was filed 02/03/2023. [Entered: 02/17/2023 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for Warden. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/15/2023 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to file document out of time filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 02/17/2023 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 9 No action will be taken on Motion for extension to file TOF [ # 8 ].; Motion for extension to file appellant brief [ # 8 ]. The referenced filings from Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel are unnecessary because a TOF is not required for this appeal and a briefing schedule has not been issued. [Entered: 02/06/2023 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for extension of time to file a Transcript Order Form to 04/07/2023, for extension of time to file appellants brief to 04/07/2023 filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 02/06/2023 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 02/06/2023 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel. [Entered: 02/06/2023 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Stephen Mark McDaniel. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/01/2023 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 No action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ].; Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 3 ]. The referenced filings from Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. Additionally, to proceed IFP was already granted in the district court. [Entered: 01/20/2023 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP, for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 01/20/2023 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel was filed on 12/15/2022. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stephen Mark McDaniel on 01/17/2023. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stephen McDaniel v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Mark McDaniel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
