John Spencer v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
| JOHN PAUL SPENCER |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 23-10209 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 No action will be taken on Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9 ].; Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 10 ]. The referenced filing from Appellant John Paul Spencer is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant John Paul Spencer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant John Paul Spencer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant John Paul Spencer. [Entered: 02/07/2023 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party John Paul Spencer. No hearings. [Entered: 02/07/2023 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Rachael Kaiman for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10209] (ECF: Rachael Kaiman) [Entered: 01/27/2023 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rachael Kaiman for Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corr. [23-10209] (ECF: Rachael Kaiman) [Entered: 01/25/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant John Paul Spencer was filed on 01/23/2023. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant John Paul Spencer was filed on 12/16/2022. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant John Paul Spencer was filed on 11/08/2022. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Paul Spencer on 01/17/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Spencer v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOHN PAUL SPENCER | |
| Represented By: | John Paul Spencer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Rachael Kaiman |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
