Larry Grady v. Kevin White, et al
| LARRY JEROME GRADY |
| KEVIN WHITE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA |
| 23-10217 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Larry Jerome Grady v. Kevin White, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Larry Jerome Grady failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/07/2023 03:40 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Appellant's brief filed by Larry Jerome Grady. Service date: 02/17/2023. [Entered: 02/17/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Larry Jerome Grady. [Entered: 02/03/2023 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Larry Jerome Grady. *No selections were made* [Entered: 02/03/2023 08:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Larry Jerome Grady was filed on 01/26/2023. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 01/27/2023 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Larry Jerome Grady on 01/23/2023. Appellant brief due 40 days from 01/24/2023. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/24/2023 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
