Richard Reed, II v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
| RICHARD BARRIE REED, II |
| CITY OF FORT PIERCE, CITY MANAGER, FORT PIERCE, FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and DIANE HOBLEY-BURNEY |
| 23-10226 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Over the phone extension granted by clerk. The appellant's brief is due on 03/31/2023, with the appellant's appendix due within seven days of the filing date of the appellant's brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 No action will be taken on the appellant's motion to file a civil appeal statement out of time because it is unnecessary. A pro se appellant is not required to file a civil appeal statement. [Entered: 02/27/2023 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10226] (ECF: Patricia Chapman) [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 Todd Norbraten and Guy Bennett Rubin for Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II have been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement (CAS) and a motion to file the CAS out of time are filed. [Entered: 02/09/2023 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Douglas T. Noah for City Manager, Fort Pierce, City of Fort Pierce, Fort Pierce Police Department and Diane Hobley-Burney. [23-10226] (ECF: Douglas Noah) [Entered: 02/08/2023 06:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Patricia R. Chapman for City Manager, Fort Pierce, City of Fort Pierce, Fort Pierce Police Department and Diane Hobley-Burney. [23-10226] (ECF: Patricia Chapman) [Entered: 02/08/2023 06:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Guy Bennett Rubin for Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10226] (ECF: Guy Rubin) [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/01/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 02/01/2023 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Todd Norbraten for Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 02/01/2023 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Todd Norbraten for Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [23-10226] (ECF: Todd Norbraten) [Entered: 01/31/2023 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Richard Barrie Reed, II on 01/19/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/08/2023 as to Appellant Richard Barrie Reed II. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/22/2023 as to Appellee City of Fort Pierce [Entered: 01/25/2023 12:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
