Alfredo Rasco v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: ALFREDO FELIPE RASCO
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 23-10328
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Alfredo Felipe Rasco. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 03/27/2023 04:45 PM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 8 Returned Mail was received for Party Alfredo Felipe Rasco. IN RE: 01/30/2023 corrected DKT-2 Letter. [Entered: 03/14/2023 10:08 AM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 7 Appellate fee was paid on 03/09/2023 as to Appellant Alfredo Felipe Rasco. [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:12 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Alfredo Felipe Rasco. [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:52 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 4 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:49 PM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 6 Returned Mail was received for Party Alfredo Felipe Rasco. IN RE: 01/30/2023 Initial Docketing Letter [Entered: 03/03/2023 11:25 AM]
February 16, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alfredo Felipe Rasco. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:09 PM]
February 1, 2023 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Alfredo Felipe Rasco was filed on 01/03/2023. Docket Entry 51. [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:06 PM]
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Alfredo Felipe Rasco on 01/30/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alfredo Rasco v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ALFREDO FELIPE RASCO
Represented By: Alfredo Felipe Rasco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?