Joe Russell, Jr. v. USP Atlanta Warden
| JOE B. RUSSELL, JR. |
| USP ATLANTA WARDEN |
| 23-10330 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [13] [Entered: 03/22/2023 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 Notice of receipt: Transcript Order Form and Notice of Appeal as to Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr.. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Both already received. [Entered: 03/08/2023 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 11 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr. was filed on 03/02/2023. Docket Entry 30. [Entered: 03/02/2023 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Joe B. Russell, Jr.. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 03/02/2023 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr. [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 02/23/2023 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr.. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 02/22/2023 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joe B. Russell, Jr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/17/2023 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Adam Nugent for Appellee USP Atlanta Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10330] (ECF: Adam Nugent) [Entered: 02/14/2023 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gabriel A. Mendel for USP Atlanta Warden [23-10330] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Adam Nugent for USP Atlanta Warden [23-10330] (ECF: Adam Nugent) [Entered: 02/07/2023 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr. was filed on 01/11/2023. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 02/02/2023 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe B. Russell, Jr. on 01/27/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 02/02/2023 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
