Edward Ridley v. Karl Fort, et al
| EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY |
| KARL FORT, TIMOTHY C. WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 23-10492 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Angela Ellen Cusimano for Appellees Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections and Timothy C. Ward. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10492] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 03/21/2023 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Edward Tyrone Ridley. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 03/09/2023 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Edward Tyrone Ridley. [Entered: 03/09/2023 07:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for Karl Fort, Timothy Ward, and Georgia Department of Corrections [23-10492] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 02/27/2023 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 02/14/2023. Docket Entry 36. [Entered: 02/24/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edward Tyrone Ridley on 02/10/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 02/24/2023 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
