Kelvin Mitchell v. Sharon Reeves, et al
| KELVIN MITCHELL |
| SHARON REEVES, CYNTHIA MCDONALD and LULA TYSON-BAILEY |
| 23-10501 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file the appellants' brief, to and including May 10, 2023, is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 12 ] Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:56 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 05/10/2023 filed by Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. Motion is Unopposed. [12] [23-10501] (ECF: Robbie Hyde) [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 11 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 03/08/2023 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 10 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Robbie Alexander Hyde for Appellants Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. [23-10501] (ECF: Robbie Hyde) [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robbie Alexander Hyde for Appellants Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10501] (ECF: Robbie Hyde) [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 8 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Sharon Reeves. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/10/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Robbie Alexander Hyde for Appellants Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Robbie Alexander Hyde for Appellants Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [23-10501] (ECF: Robbie Hyde) [Entered: 03/01/2023 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ashley Nicole Smith for Kelvin Mitchell. [23-10501] (ECF: Ashley Smith) [Entered: 03/01/2023 07:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order: ORDER: Based on the representations made on the record as to Appellant Sharon Reeves was filed on 02/16/2023. Docket Entry 95. [Entered: 02/27/2023 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bart Gregory Harmon for Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. [23-10501] (ECF: Bart Harmon) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robbie Alexander Hyde for Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey. [23-10501] (ECF: Robbie Hyde) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Cynthia McDonald, Sharon Reeves and Lula Tyson-Bailey on 02/15/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/07/2023 as to Appellant Sharon Reeves. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/21/2023 as to Appellee Kelvin Mitchell [Entered: 02/21/2023 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
