James Ballard v. State of Florida
| JAMES LEE BALLARD |
| STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 23-10612 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant Request for Status on 13 cases. [23-10662, 22-12274, 22-12306, 22-14141, 22-12649, 22-13191, 22-12651, 22-14162, 23-10022, 23-10238, 23-10207, 23-10318, 23-10612]We have received your status request. Please be advised that a docket sheet costs .50 cents per page for each appeal. The current total number of pages for the docket sheet of every case you requested is 46 pages. You may attach a check or money order for the total with your request.--[Edited 04/12/2023 by KJJ] [Entered: 04/12/2023 11:43 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant James Lee Ballard has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/31/2023 01:50 PM]
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Lee Ballard. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/16/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order Denying appointment of counsel as to Appellant James Lee Ballard was filed on 03/13/2023. Docket Entry 30. [Entered: 03/16/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order: USDC Order Dismissing Motion for Reconsideration as to Appellant James Lee Ballard was filed on 03/07/2023. Docket Entry 26. [Entered: 03/08/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC Order determining appellant to be 3 strikes and is required to pay the full filing fee pursuant to 1915(g). Filed on 02/27/2023. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 03/01/2023 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James Lee Ballard on 02/24/2023. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 03/01/2023 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Ballard v. State of Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES LEE BALLARD | |
| Represented By: | James Lee Ballard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
