Renardo Lewis, et al v. City Of Marietta, et al
RENARDO NEHEMIAH LEWIS and LUBREEZE LEWIS-FRANKLIN |
CITY OF MARIETTA, DAN FLYNN, ENRIQUE MALLEN, JOSHUA MADISON, STACEY FOWLER, NOAH MACK and COBB COUNTY SHERIFF |
SERVICE |
23-10614 |
February 23, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Renardo Lewis, et al. v. City of Marietta, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 No action will be taken on the appellants' motion to reinstate the appeal because appellants have not submitted a civil appeal statement [ # 8 ]. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:07 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Lubreeze Lewis-franklin. Motion is Unopposed. [8] [23-10614] (ECF: Clarence Long) [Entered: 04/18/2023 10:52 AM] |
Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellants Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-Franklin failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements and failed to file a Civil Appeal Statement within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/07/2023 09:11 AM] |
Filing 5 Appellants' brief is currently due on 04/04/2023. Over the phone 30 day extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Clarence Victor Long for Appellants Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-franklin. Appellants' brief is now due on 05/04/2023; Appendix due on 05/11/2023 as to Appellants. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 03/29/2023 02:18 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Clarence Victor Long for Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-franklin. [23-10614] (ECF: Clarence Long) [Entered: 03/29/2023 02:12 PM] |
Filing 3 Sarah Bernice Flack, Clarence Victor Long, and Kamau Kessonya Mason for Appellants Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-franklin have been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement (CAS) and a motion to file the CAS out of time are filed. [Entered: 03/17/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Sarah Bernice Flack, Clarence Victor Long, and Kamau Kessonya Mason for Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-franklin. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). [Entered: 03/17/2023 09:43 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Renardo Nehemiah Lewis and Lubreeze Lewis-franklin on 02/23/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/04/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/16/2023 as to Appellant Renardo Nehemiah Lewis. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/30/2023 as to Appellees City Of Marietta and Cobb County Sheriff [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.