In re: AFC Franchising, LLC
Petitioner: In re: AFC FRANCHISING, LLC
Respondent: DANILO PURUGGANAN
Case Number: 23-10756
Filed: March 9, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner AFC Franchising, LLC. Served 03/09/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid [Entered: 03/10/2023 02:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: AFC Franchising, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: AFC FRANCHISING, LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Douglas
Represented By: Joe L. Leak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DANILO PURUGGANAN
Represented By: Allan L. Armstrong
Represented By: Robert E. Battle
Represented By: Laura Marie Carbo
Represented By: Darrell L. Cartwright
Represented By: Adam Patterson Plant
Represented By: Allan Samuels
Represented By: Harlan F. Winn III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?