Clifford Reid v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
| CLIFFORD LEON REID |
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 23-10788 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Clifford Leon Reid. Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 6 ]. The dismissal deficiency has not been cured. [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Clifford Leon Reid. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ]. The motion was required to be filed in the DC. [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to reinstate appeal, to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Clifford Leon Reid. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Clifford Leon Reid. [Entered: 04/19/2023 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address for Party Clifford Leon Reid. [Entered: 04/19/2023 09:16 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Clifford Leon Reid failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/12/2023 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Clifford Leon Reid. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/29/2023 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Clifford Leon Reid on 03/10/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Clifford Reid v. Secretary, Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CLIFFORD LEON REID | |
| Represented By: | Clifford Leon Reid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
