Frederick Green v. James Blair, et al
| FREDERICK DWIGHT GREEN |
| JAMES BLAIR and JAMAL FOREMAN |
| 23-10797 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Related cases? No. [23-10797] (ECF: Paul Henefeld) [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Paul Henefeld for James Blair. The required document has not been received. Please promptly file the appearance of counsel form.. [Entered: 04/18/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-10797] (ECF: Paul Henefeld) [Entered: 04/13/2023 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Frederick Dwight Green. [Entered: 04/13/2023 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Paul Henefeld for James Blair, Terry L. Long for Jamal Foreman and Annarita Leigh McGovern for Jamal Foreman. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/13/2023 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 04/10/2023. Docket Entry 99. [Entered: 04/12/2023 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Letter in regards to appeal. as to Appellant Frederick Dwight Green.. [Entered: 04/04/2023 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Frederick Dwight Green. [Entered: 04/03/2023 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Frederick Dwight Green. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/30/2023 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Frederick Dwight Green on 03/06/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 03/15/2023 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
