Thomas Whittle v. The State of Georgia, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant / Appellee: THE STATE OF GEORGIA, TIMOTHY VAUGHN, KELLI ADAMS, STEVE HARRISON, ASHLEY MCGLAUGHLIN, S. B. ANDREWS and JEROME DANIELS
Case Number: 23-10820
Filed: March 14, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Filing 8 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle. Motion for leave to proceed [ # 7 ].; Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 7 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements and this case is closed. [Entered: 04/20/2023 08:01 AM]
April 19, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for leave to proceed, for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 04/20/2023 08:00 AM]
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:56 PM]
April 4, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Thomas Andrew Whittle. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/04/2023 10:00 AM]
April 4, 2023 Filing 4 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle. Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 2 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 04/04/2023 09:42 AM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of receipt: Request for all necessary documents, forms, rules and complaint as to Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle. [Entered: 04/04/2023 09:23 AM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 04/04/2023 09:03 AM]
March 14, 2023 Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas Andrew Whittle on 03/14/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. USDC motion Pending: Motion to Appoint Counsel, DE #28 03/14/2023. [Entered: 03/16/2023 03:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Whittle v. The State of Georgia, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Whittle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIMOTHY VAUGHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KELLI ADAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVE HARRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ASHLEY MCGLAUGHLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: S. B. ANDREWS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEROME DANIELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?