Charles Brown, Jr. v. Georgia Department of Public Safety, et al
| CHARLES BROWN, JR. |
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, R. SCHOFILL and SHIVER |
| 23-11096 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Charles Brown, Jr. failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:35 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr.. IN RE: DIS-1 Deficiency Letter dated May 4, 2023. [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 12 Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr. IN RE: JUR-1 Resp reqd JQ. [Entered: 05/25/2023 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr.. IN RE: DKT-6AIFP denied by DC after docketing Letter dated April 21, 2023. [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr.. IN RE: CIP Deficiency Letter dated May 4, 2023. [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellee Georgia Department of Public Safety. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 05/04/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Charles Brown, Jr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/04/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Charles Brown, Jr. [Entered: 05/02/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 **ERROR**Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr. IN RE: CAS-3 CAS overdue Letter dated April 21, 2023. [Entered: 05/04/2023 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 Returned Mail was received for Party Charles Brown, Jr. IN RE: CIVIL-Notice of Docketing Letter dated April 10, 2023. [Entered: 05/04/2023 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Charles Brown, Jr. was filed on 04/17/2023. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 04/21/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 Removed from case: Attorney Christopher Michael Carr for Appellee Georgia Department of Public Safety in 23-11096. [Entered: 04/11/2023 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Brown, Jr. on 04/04/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. 04/05/2023 Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/24/2023 as to Appellant Charles Brown Jr. [Entered: 04/10/2023 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
