Nadia Jackson v. Hennepin Co. Dept. of HR and Public Health, et al
| NADIA JACKSON |
| HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES and SOUTHERN REGIONAL HOSPITAL |
| 23-11195 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for Georgia Department of Human Resources and Wade Wilkes Herring, III for Georgia Department of Human Resources. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/17/2023 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Nadia Jackson was filed on 05/03/2023. Docket Entry 46. [Entered: 05/17/2023 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Alexander C. Vey for Appellee Southern Regional Hospital. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-11195] (ECF: Alexander Vey) [Entered: 05/16/2023 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Nadia Jackson. No hearings. [Entered: 05/09/2023 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Nadia Jackson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/03/2023 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alexander C. Vey for Appellee Southern Regional Hospital Related cases? No. [23-11195] (ECF: Alexander Vey) [Entered: 05/02/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Nadia Jackson on 04/07/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. 04/10/2023 Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/02/2023 as to Appellant Nadia Jackson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/16/2023 as to Appellees Georgia Department of Human Resources & Public Health and Southern Regional Hospital. [Entered: 04/18/2023 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
