Lena Lindberg v. Dean LaCorte, et al
LENA MARIE LINDBERG |
DEAN LACORTE, TY BERDEAUX, MATTHEW PATTERSON, SCOTT ELLIS, ROBERT BLAISE TRETTIS, RHONDA BABB, UNKNOWN ALLEGHENY PRINCIPAL, C. THOMPSON, VICTOR N. GRIFFIS, JAMES D. PORTMAN, ROBERT KERNSNICK, EXECUTING AGENT, HAL UHRIG, CONNIE JO KOENIG, KIMBERLY MUSSELMAN, B. BROXTON, BEACHSIDE WAYNE, SARENA SUNDERLIN, BRYAN MERCER, BOOKING OFFICER, BCSO CLERK, MARK MEDLEY, EDWARD MATEO, NIGHT ATTEMPT KIDNAP 1, NIGHT ATTEMPT KIDNAP 2, NIGHT ATTEMPT KIDNAP 3, UNKNOWN PERSON, LINDA EDMISTON, OFFICER WIMMER, OFFICER HERON, IHBPD OFFICER, LORI FRANCIS, KATHY GIL, STORY LEDUC, IMURIT OBREGON, KELLI CAMPBELL, ONLINE OFFICER, WAYNE IVEY, B. SMITH, BCSO 1972, BREVARD DEPUTY 666, DEPUTY CLERK SHERYL, JIM WHIGHAM and PLUTE |
23-11256 |
April 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Personal Property Damage |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Lena Lindberg v. Dean LaCorte, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Judgment entered as to Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. [Entered: 06/08/2023 12:56 PM] |
Filing 19 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to certify question filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion to amend the style of this appeal filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ], Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 16 ], Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 12 ]; Motion to treat document as Highly Sensitive filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion for clarification filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion for attorney's fees filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion for injunction pending appeal filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ], Motion for injunction pending appeal filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 12 ]; Motion Protective Restraining Order filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion for transfer of motion to district court. filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 18 ]; Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 16 ], Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 12 ]; Motion to transfer case filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 16 ]. (See 06/08/2023 opinion)(CRW/ELB/RJL) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 06/08/2023 12:53 PM] |
Filing 18 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to certify question, to amend the style of this appeal, for appointment of counsel, to treat document as a Highly Sensitive Document, to clarification, for attorney's fees or costs, for injunction pending appeal, Protective Restraining Order., to take judicial notice, for Transfer of Motion to District Court filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. Motion is Unopposed. [18] [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/26/2023 05:14 PM] |
Filing 17 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg [ # 16 ]. Incorrect event(s) have been selected. Further, there is a motion to consolidate already pending with the court. [Entered: 05/26/2023 02:43 PM] |
Filing 16 MOTION to proceed IFP, to consolidate appeals 23-10409, 23-10494, 23-10596, 23-10597, 23-10991, 23-11252,23-11253, 23-11254, 23-11255, 23-11256, 23-11257, 23-11559, 23-126 (cafc), 23-1580, 22-3229 (7ca), 23-0929, 23-7058, 22C2214, , 1:23-cv-00265, 23-01142, 23-01186, SC22-1763, SC22-1283, SC21-208, for appointment of counsel, to transfer case filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. Opposing Counsel takes no Position. [16] [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/26/2023 12:59 PM] |
Filing 15 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg was filed on 05/22/2023. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 05/24/2023 12:17 PM] |
Filing 14 Notice of filing proof of service filed by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/11/2023 11:37 PM] |
Filing 13 U.S. court of appeals 7th circuit Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (Chicago) filed jurisdictional memorandum filed by Lindberg 4/10/23 in response to an order received by Lindberg from the court and May 5, 2023 order granting IFP (DC Cir.) filed by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/07/2023 12:19 AM] |
Filing 12 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to consolidate appeals 23-10409, 23-10494, 23-10596, 23-10597, 23-10991, 23-11252,23-11253, 23-11254, 23-11255, 23-11256, 23-11257, 23-126 (cafc), 23-1580 (7ca), 22-3229 (7ca), and 1:23-cv-00929, 1:22-cv-2214, 1:23-cv-00265, for appointment of counsel, for injunction pending appeal filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [12] [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/05/2023 05:14 PM] |
Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. No hearings. [Entered: 05/03/2023 01:00 PM] |
Filing 10 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. There is a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 8 ] already pending in the USDC. [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:41 AM] |
Filing 9 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. Your motion for leave of court to file petition for a writ of mandamus out of time [ # 8 ] is not filed under the correct event. [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:37 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION to consolidate briefing schedule, to proceed IFP filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8] [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/02/2023 09:30 PM] |
Filing 7 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. There is a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ] already pending in the USDC. [Entered: 05/02/2023 08:54 AM] |
Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [6] [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/01/2023 09:55 PM] |
Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/01/2023 09:50 PM] |
Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/01/2023 09:42 PM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 05/01/2023 03:14 PM] |
Filing 2 Notice of change of address filed by Party Lena Marie Lindberg. [23-11256] (ECF: Lena Lindberg) [Entered: 04/30/2023 12:51 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg on 04/08/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for IFP, DE #15. 04/14/2023 Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/03/2023 as to Appellant Lena Marie Lindberg. [Entered: 04/19/2023 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.