Nasedra Lumpkin v. Florida Department of Corrections
NASEDRA K. LUMPKIN |
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
23-11779 |
May 25, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 07/11/2023 08:05 AM] |
Filing 8 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin. Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal [ # 7 ] is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:51 PM] |
Filing 7 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:50 PM] |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Alexandra Antoinette Folley for Appellee Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-11779] (ECF: Alexandra Folley) [Entered: 06/22/2023 11:52 AM] |
Filing 5 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 06/21/2023 08:00 AM] |
Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin. [Entered: 06/14/2023 09:38 AM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alexandra Folley for Florida Department of Corrections Related cases? No. [23-11779] (ECF: Alexandra Folley) [Entered: 06/01/2023 08:52 AM] |
Filing 2 Notice of receipt: Duplicate NOA filed in USDC at DE #7 as to Appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin. [Entered: 06/01/2023 08:16 AM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Nasedra K. Lumpkin on 05/22/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Nasedra Lumpkin v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: NASEDRA K. LUMPKIN | |
Represented By: | Nasedra K. Lumpkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Alexandra Antoinette Folley |
Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.