Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
| JUMPING JACK RETAIL II, INC. |
| 7-ELEVEN, INC. |
| 23-11852 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Franchise |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 07/18/2023 11:46 AM]
|
| Filing 12 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. Motion to adopt motions or responses [ # 11 ] appears intended for another court -captioned for district court. Also Attorney Kenneth Mair has not filed an appearance form in this court. Please call 404-335-6125 for assistance with properly filing documents in this court. All motions filed in this court require a Certificate of Interested Persons. [Entered: 07/18/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to adopt motions or responses filed by Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [11] [23-11852] (ECF: Kenneth Mair) [Entered: 07/14/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 07/12/2023 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Kenneth S. Mair for Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [23-11852] (ECF: Kenneth Mair) [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Kenneth S. Mair for Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-11852] (ECF: Kenneth Mair) [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 06/28/2023 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Kenneth S. Mair for Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files BOTH (1) a Civil Appeal Statement AND (2) a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 06/28/2023 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Kenneth S. Mair for Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 06/28/2023 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Christian Charles Burden for 7-Eleven, Inc. Attorney Christian Charles Burden for Appellee 7-Eleven, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-11852] (ECF: Christian Burden) [Entered: 06/27/2023 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christian Charles Burden for 7-Eleven, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-11852] (ECF: Christian Burden) [Entered: 06/16/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily A. Plakon for 7-Eleven, Inc. Related cases? No. [23-11852] (ECF: Emily Plakon) [Entered: 06/15/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. on 06/01/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. 06/02/2023 Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/22/2023 as to Appellant Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/06/2023 as to Appellee 7-Eleven, Inc. [Entered: 06/08/2023 03:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JUMPING JACK RETAIL II, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth S. Mair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: 7-ELEVEN, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Christian Charles Burden |
| Represented By: | Emily A. Plakon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
