Roy Day v. GEICO General Insurance Company, et al
| ROY A. DAY |
| GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DONALD J. TRUMP, WILLIAM BARR, ELLEN GORMAN, 21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KATHRYN KIMBALL MIZELLE and JAMES M. SHAW, JR. |
| 23-11935 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Notice of District Court Order on IFP as to Appellant Roy A. Day.. [Entered: 06/16/2023 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Roy A. Day was filed on 06/13/2023. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 06/13/2023 02:48 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Roy A. Day failed to comply with this Court's September 28, 1998 order that he first obtain an order from the district court certifying that the appeal is not frivolous or that the appellate docketing and filing fees are paid in full at the time he files his notice of appeal. [Entered: 06/12/2023 04:34 PM]
|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Roy A. Day on 06/08/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion to Appeal In Forma Pauperis DE # 36. 06/08/2023 Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/26/2023 as to Appellant Roy A. Day. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/10/2023 as to Appellee GEICO General Insurance Company [Entered: 06/12/2023 04:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
