Lamar Casleberry v. David Ekwinife, et al
| LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY |
| DAVID EKWINIFE, BALDWIN SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, BALDWIN STATE PRISON, SANDFORD, LOWIN, LANGO, WOMBLE, ANDREW, OPOKU, JOHN AND JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES |
| 23-12384 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Lamar Deshawn Casleberry failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 08/23/2023 08:09 AM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Lamar Deshawn Casleberry. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/08/2023 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Lamar Deshawn Casleberry on 07/21/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 07/24/2023 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
