Ramon Lopez-Alvarado v. USA
| RAMON LOPEZ-ALVARADO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-12460 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 09/21/2023 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Michelle Thresher Taylor for USA. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/15/2023 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-12460] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 09/14/2023 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. Related cases? No. [23-12460] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 12 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. [Entered: 09/13/2023 04:46 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado is GRANTED by clerk [ # 8 ]. [Entered: 09/13/2023 04:39 PM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to file CIP out of time filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. Motion for extension to file Certificate of Interested Persons [ # 6 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 08/22/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file Certificate of Interested Persons to 09/11/2023 filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 08/22/2023 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Ramon Lopez-Alvarado. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado was filed on 08/15/2023. Docket Entry 33. [Entered: 08/16/2023 07:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado was filed on 05/31/2023. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado was filed on 03/29/2022. Docket Entry 5. [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ramon Lopez-Alvarado on 07/27/2023. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramon Lopez-Alvarado v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RAMON LOPEZ-ALVARADO | |
| Represented By: | Ramon Lopez-Alvarado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Michelle Thresher Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
