Benjamin Lollis v. City of Atlanta
| BENJAMIN D. LOLLIS |
| CITY OF ATLANTA |
| 23-12525 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Benjamin Lollis v. City of Atlanta |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. [Entered: 09/22/2023 10:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 09/22/2023 09:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. forwarded from another court. See FRAP 25(a)(1) and is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of receipt: Notice of Receipt from Northern District of Georgia District Court. as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Judgment entered as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. [Entered: 09/07/2023 01:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 09/07/2023 01:38 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis was filed on 08/30/2023. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 09/05/2023 03:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 08/24/2023 05:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis. [Entered: 08/21/2023 08:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis on 08/01/2023. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/18/2023 as to Appellant Benjamin D. Lollis [Entered: 08/04/2023 01:24 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Benjamin Lollis v. City of Atlanta | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: BENJAMIN D. LOLLIS | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin D. Lollis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF ATLANTA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
