Felipe Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility, et al
| FELIPE IGNACIO RIVADENEIRA |
| D. RAY JAMES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRONIC CARE CLINICS, Medical Facility, THE GEO GROUP, INC., A Florida Corporation, JOHN OLIVER, MR. T. JOHNS, MS. GREEN, MR. MCCOY, JOSE JIMENEZ and DR. BRIAN MAZIAR |
| 23-12736 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Charles K. Wainright, II for Brian Maziar. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/22/2023 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Maggie L. McMichael for Appellee Brian Maziarz Related cases? No. [23-12736] (ECF: Maggie McMichael) [Entered: 09/21/2023 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles K. Wainright, II for Appellee Brian Maziarz Related cases? No. [23-12736] (ECF: Charles Wainright) [Entered: 09/21/2023 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Charles K. Wainright, II for Appellee Brian Maziarz. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-12736] (ECF: Charles Wainright) [Entered: 09/21/2023 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal construed from appellants consent form filed by Appellant Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 09/15/2023 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 6 Consent Form filed by Appellant Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. [Entered: 09/15/2023 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. No hearings. [Entered: 09/15/2023 07:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. [Entered: 09/15/2023 07:31 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira on 08/14/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
