Johnnie Thomas v. John Myers
| JOHNNIE MARENE THOMAS |
| JOHN S. MYERS |
| 23-12789 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 10/13/2023 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 7 Appellate fee was paid on 10/02/2023 as to Appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas. [Entered: 10/05/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney William R. Ashe for Appellee John S. Myers. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-12789] (ECF: William Ashe) [Entered: 09/26/2023 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice of receipt: Appellant letter regarding dismissal letter, as to Appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas. [Entered: 09/28/2023 09:42 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 09/21/2023 12:16 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Johnnie Marene Thomas. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William R. Ashe for John S. Myers. Related cases? Yes. [23-12789] (ECF: William Ashe) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas on 08/17/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/12/2023 as to Appellant Johnnie Marene Thomas. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/26/2023 as to Appellee John S. Myers [Entered: 08/29/2023 09:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Johnnie Thomas v. John Myers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOHNNIE MARENE THOMAS | |
| Represented By: | Johnnie Marene Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JOHN S. MYERS | |
| Represented By: | William R. Ashe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
