Carlos Shaarbay v. North Country lnsurance 3321Group LLC, et al
| CARLOS SHAARBAY |
| NORTH COUNTRY LNSURANCE 3321GROUP LLC, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, AMAZON.COM, INC. and U.S. GOVERNMENT |
| 23-12839 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Carlos Shaarbay was filed on 10/06/2023. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:01 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Carlos Shaarbay failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/21/2023 12:25 PM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Carlos Shaarbay. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/18/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Carlos Shaarbay on 08/28/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/15/2023 as to Appellant Carlos Shaarbay [Entered: 09/01/2023 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
