Eduardo Bonilla v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
| EDUARDO BONILLA |
| WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP II |
| 23-12844 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USDC order denying IFP AS MOOT as to Appellant Eduardo Bonilla was filed on 10/23/2023. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 10/25/2023 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 8 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 7 ] Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 7 ] is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 10/17/2023 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to reinstate appeal, to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 10/17/2023 01:13 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Eduardo Bonilla failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a CORRECTED Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 10/11/2023 08:36 AM]
|
| Filing 5 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 4 ] is deficient for failure to attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. Additionally, the motion for IFP is not yet due in this court as there has been no IFP motion on appeal filed in the district court. [Entered: 10/03/2023 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 10/03/2023 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. Transcript Order Form is not signed or dated. Appellant must file a CORRECTED Transcript Order Form within 7 days of this notice. [Entered: 10/03/2023 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla. [Entered: 10/03/2023 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eduardo Bonilla on 08/28/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 09/01/2023 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Eduardo Bonilla v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: EDUARDO BONILLA | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo Bonilla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP II | |
| Represented By: | Janelle Christine DiNicola |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
