Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
| DARYL SHARP |
| ARCHBISHOP TIMOTHY DOLAN, ARCHBISHOP JOSE GOMEZ VELASCO, ARCHBISHOP ALLEN VIGNERON and BISHOP GREGORY PARKES |
| 23-12930 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Daryl Sharp. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 10/12/2023 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Daryl Sharp DE #: 11 [Entered: 09/28/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Daryl Sharp. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/25/2023 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Daryl Sharp was filed on 09/13/2023. Docket Entry 10. [Entered: 09/15/2023 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daryl Sharp on 09/01/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis by Daryl Sharp DE#7. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/22/2023 as to Appellant Daryl Sharp [Entered: 09/08/2023 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
