George Metz, II v. Milne, et al
| GEORGE D. METZ, II |
| OFFICER MILNE and SGT KELLY |
| 23-12936 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant George D. Metz, II was filed on 10/11/2023. Docket Entry 58. [Entered: 10/12/2023 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 12 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant George D. Metz, II. [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 8 Notice of receipt: CIP Forwarded from District court. as to Appellant George D. Metz, II. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN All filings to the appeals court must be submitted to the appeals court clerk.. [Entered: 10/03/2023 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 7 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR - TIMELY CIP RECEIVED***NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to George D. Metz, II. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s).--[Edited 10/13/2023 by KJJ] [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party George D. Metz, II. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant George D. Metz, II. [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 6 Notice: The deficiency issued to Michael W. Rich for Milne and Kelly is hereby rescinded. No further action is necessary. [Entered: 09/13/2023 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Michael W. Rich for Milne and Kelly. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 09/13/2023 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to amend the style of this appeal filed by Kelly and Milne. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [4] [23-12936] (ECF: Michael Rich) [Entered: 09/12/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michael W. Rich for "Officer Milne" and "Sgt Kelley". On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-12936] (ECF: Michael Rich) [Entered: 09/12/2023 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael W. Rich for "Officer Milne" and "Sgt Kelley" Related cases? No. [23-12936] (ECF: Michael Rich) [Entered: 09/12/2023 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant George D. Metz, II on 09/07/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by George D. Metz, II DE#54. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/22/2023 as to Appellant George D. Metz II. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/06/2023 as to Appellee Milne [Entered: 09/08/2023 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
