Antonio Andrews v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTONIO T. ANDREWS
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-12984
Filed: September 12, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Antonio T. Andrews because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 10/30/2023. The Dismissal deficiencies were cured on the same date as dismissal. [Entered: 11/06/2023 02:42 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Antonio T. Andrews. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:28 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 14 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:25 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [13] [Entered: 11/06/2023 02:50 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION MOOT: Motion for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal is MOOT [ # 9 ]; Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is MOOT [ # 8 ] due to this Court's order filed 10/30/2023. Motion filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. [Entered: 10/30/2023 12:11 PM]
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Antonio T. Andrews failed to comply with the order of this court, failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements, and failed to file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/30/2023 12:10 PM]
October 18, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 10/18/2023 10:38 AM]
October 12, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 10/18/2023 10:35 AM]
October 12, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of receipt: Transcript Order Form and Certificate of Interested Persons as to Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Documents are out of time.. [Entered: 10/18/2023 10:33 AM]
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The court directs the Appellant Antonio T. Andrews to file a substitute, signed notice of appeal in the district court within fourteen days. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b).. RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/10/2023 02:26 PM]
October 3, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Antonio T. Andrews. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/03/2023 04:50 PM]
October 3, 2023 Filing 3 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Antonio T. Andrews. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/03/2023 04:49 PM]
September 12, 2023 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Antonio T. Andrews was filed on 08/07/2023. Docket Entry 34. [Entered: 09/12/2023 01:50 PM]
September 12, 2023 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Antonio T. Andrews on 09/11/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 09/12/2023 01:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antonio Andrews v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ANTONIO T. ANDREWS
Represented By: Antonio T. Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?