Samantha Johnson v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: SAMANTHA JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 23-13082
Filed: September 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Samantha Johnson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:59 AM]
October 16, 2023 Filing 8 Returned Mail was received for Party Samantha Johnson. IN RE: 9/22/2023 Docketing Notice [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:25 PM]
October 10, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Samantha Johnson. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/10/2023 10:03 AM]
October 5, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by AUSA Daniel Matzin Related cases? No. [23-13082] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 10/05/2023 09:58 AM]
October 4, 2023 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Matzkin for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13082] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 10/04/2023 10:09 AM]
September 28, 2023 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [23-13082] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 09/28/2023 09:48 PM]
September 22, 2023 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Samantha Johnson was filed on 08/04/2023. Docket Entry 10. [Entered: 09/22/2023 11:59 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Samantha Johnson on 09/18/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 09/22/2023 11:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Samantha Johnson v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: SAMANTHA JOHNSON
Represented By: Samantha Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daniel Matzkin
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?