Robert Harris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
| ROBERT MARVIN HARRIS |
| WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I |
| 23-13137 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. Motion for Leave to File Out of Time [ # 11 ]. Appellant's CIP was timely. [Entered: 11/07/2023 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to file Certificate of Interested Persons out of time filed by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 11/07/2023 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice of receipt: Support for Motion for IFP as to Appellant Robert Marvin Harris.. [Entered: 11/03/2023 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 11/02/2023 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 13 Notice of receipt: Notice of Appeal as to Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Appears to be intended for the District Court. [Entered: 11/08/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. [Entered: 10/17/2023 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Robert Marvin Harris. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/17/2023 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for release pending appeal filed by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 10/17/2023 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Robert Marvin Harris. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 10/17/2023 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Robert Marvin Harris was filed on 10/13/2023. Docket Entry 14. [Entered: 10/13/2023 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 10 Notice of receipt: Request as to Appellant Robert Marvin Harris. [Entered: 11/07/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 PREMATURE Appellant's brief filed by Robert Marvin Harris. Service date: 10/11/2023. [Entered: 10/11/2023 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Robert Marvin Harris on 09/26/2023 USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on 09/25/2023. DE# 12. Fee Status: IFP Pending. [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Harris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT MARVIN HARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Robert Marvin Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
