Christopher Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist A, et al
| CHRISTOPHER BAYLOR |
| THE FLORIDA KLU KLUX KLAN FOR THE TRADITIONALIST AMERICANS, CHARLES T. CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JAMIE GROSSHANS, JORGE LABARGA, JOHN COURIEL, BRIAN D. LAMBERT, FREDERIC RAND WALLIS, JAMES A. EDWARDS, ERIC EISNAUGLE, JOHN M. HARRIS, ROBERT MORRIS, CRAIG C. VILLANTI, SUZANNE LABRIT, DANIEL H. SLEET, ANTHONY K. BLACK, CURTIS JACOBUS, JOHN TOMASINO, MARK CLAYTON, PATRICIA J. KELLY, SANDRA WILLIAMS and MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL |
| 23-13250 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Christopher Baylor. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [20] [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 11/23/2023 07:06 AM] |
| Filing 19 Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction is MOOT [ # 6 ]; Rehearing panel rehrg with en banc is MOOT [ # 15 ]; Rehearing en banc rehrg is MOOT [ # 15 ] due to the dismissal order dated 11/14/23. [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:16 PM] |
Filing 18
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Christopher Baylor failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Christopher Baylor. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 11/14/2023 02:59 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time TOF is GRANTED by clerk [ # 14 ]. [Entered: 11/14/2023 02:58 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellant Christopher Baylor. [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 11/14/2023 12:56 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION for extension of time to file a transcript to 11/15/2023 filed by. [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 11/05/2023 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. for Appellees Anthony K. Black, Charles T. Canady, Mark Clayton, John Couriel, James A. Edwards, Eric Eisnaugle, Jamie Grosshans, John M. Harris, Curtis Jacobus, Patricia J. Kelly, Mary Elizabeth Kuenzel, Jorge Labarga, Suzanne Labrit, Brian D. Lambert, Robert Morris, Ricky Polston, Daniel H. Sleet, John Tomasino, Craig C. Villanti, Frederic Rand Wallis and Sandra Williams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13250] (ECF: Charles Schreiber) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 12 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Christopher Baylor. Motion for extension to file transcripts [ # 11 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 10/30/2023 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time to file a transcript to 11/03/2023 filed by. [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 10/28/2023 09:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Christopher Baylor. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appellate fee was paid on 10/23/2023 as to Appellant Christopher Baylor. [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:29 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Appellants emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED. The Clerks Office is DIRECTED to treat any motion for reconsideration of this order as a non-emergency matter. [ # 7 ] AJ, ELB and NGA (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/19/2023 04:54 PM]
|
| Filing 7 EMERGENCY MOTION for injunction pending appeal filed by Christopher Baylor. Motion is Opposed. [7] [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 10/18/2023 11:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction filed by Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston, Jamie Grosshans, Jorge Labarga, John Couriel, Brian D. Lambert, Frederic Rand Wallis, James A. Edwards, Eric Eisnaugle, John M. Harris, Robert Morris, Craig C. Villanti, Suzanne Labrit, Daniel H. Sleet, Anthony K. Black, Patricia J. Kelly, Curtis Jacobus, John Tomasino, Mark Clayton, Sandra Williams and Mary Elizabeth Kuenzel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [6] [23-13250] (ECF: Charles Schreiber) [Entered: 10/11/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. for Appellees Anthony K. Black, Charles T. Canady, Mark Clayton, John Couriel, James A. Edwards, Eric Eisnaugle, Jamie Grosshans, John M. Harris, Curtis Jacobus, Patricia J. Kelly, Mary Elizabeth Kuenzel, Jorge Labarga, Suzanne Labrit, Brian D. Lambert, Robert Morris, Ricky Polston, Daniel H. Sleet, John Tomasino, Craig C. Villanti, Frederic Rand Wallis and Sandra Williams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13250] (ECF: Charles Schreiber) [Entered: 10/11/2023 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. for Anthony K. Black, Charles T. Canady, Mark Clayton, John Couriel, James A. Edwards, Eric Eisnaugle, Jamie Grosshans, John M. Harris, Curtis Jacobus, Patricia J. Kelly, Mary Elizabeth Kuenzel, Jorge Labarga, Suzanne Labrit, Brian D. Lambert, Robert Morris, Ricky Polston, Daniel H. Sleet, John Tomasino, Craig C. Villanti, Frederic Rand Wallis and Sandra Williams. Related cases? No. [23-13250] (ECF: Charles Schreiber) [Entered: 10/11/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Christopher Baylor. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/11/2023 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Christopher Baylor. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13250] (ECF: Christopher Baylor) [Entered: 10/09/2023 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Baylor on 10/02/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/17/2023 as to Appellant Christopher Baylor. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/31/2023 as to Appellee Charles T. Canady [Entered: 10/03/2023 04:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.