Stephen Mayer v. Warden
STEPHEN MAYER |
FCI MIAMI WARDEN |
23-13350 |
October 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CONSTRUED MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [14] [Entered: 11/30/2023 01:22 PM] |
Filing 13 Notice of Change of Address for Party Stephen Mayer. [Entered: 11/30/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 12 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [Entered: 11/30/2023 10:51 AM] |
Filing 11 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Stephen Mayer was filed on 10/31/2023. Docket Entry 25. [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:57 PM] |
Filing 10 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Stephen Mayer. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9 ]., as the appellant must first seek in forma pauperis status in the district court. [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:54 PM] |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Matzkin for Appellee FCI Miami Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13350] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:19 PM] |
Filing 9 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:51 PM] |
Filing 7 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 6 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Stephen Mayer was filed on 10/26/2023. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 10/27/2023 02:48 PM] |
Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer. [Entered: 10/27/2023 02:45 PM] |
Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Stephen Mayer. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 10/27/2023 02:44 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [23-13350] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 10/20/2023 01:59 PM] |
Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Stephen Mayer was filed on 10/11/2023. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 10/13/2023 04:07 PM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stephen Mayer on 10/10/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 10/13/2023 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Stephen Mayer v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: STEPHEN MAYER | |
Represented By: | Stephen Mayer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: FCI MIAMI WARDEN | |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
Represented By: | Daniel Matzkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.