David Webb v. Gwinnett County Government, et al
DAVID Q. WEBB |
GWINNETT COUNTY GOVERNMENT, GWINNETT COUNTY STATE COURT, DIVISION S3, CHIEF JUDGE, GWINNETT COUNTY GA DISTRICT ATTORNEY and GWINNETT COUNTY SHERIFF |
23-13416 |
October 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
David Webb v. Gwinnett County Government, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Q. Webb failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 12/05/2023 03:14 PM] |
Filing 4 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David Q. Webb. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/21/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/30/2023 09:29 AM] |
Filing 5 Appellant's brief filed by David Q. Webb. Service date: 12/05/2023. [Entered: 12/05/2023 03:07 PM] |
Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party David Q. Webb. No hearings. [Entered: 10/30/2023 09:27 AM] |
Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Q. Webb. [Entered: 10/30/2023 09:22 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Q. Webb on 10/10/2023. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/01/2023 as to Appellant David Q. Webb [Entered: 10/18/2023 01:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.