Charles Robinson v. Donald Leavins, et al
| CHARLES M. ROBINSON |
| DONALD LEAVINS, BROWN, CPT, HUGHES, CPT, YOUNG, LT, MEDDERS, LT, MARTIN, SGT, RODRIGUES, Officer, VAUGHN, Officer and BENSTON, Officer |
| 23-13465 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Charles M. Robinson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/15/2023 12:22 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Motion to request for extension of time as to Appellant Charles M. Robinson. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN the Court is unsure of your extension request, not specified. This case is closed. [Entered: 11/15/2023 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Charles M. Robinson. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles M. Robinson on 10/19/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
