Tommy Lay, II v. Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.
| TOMMY D. LAY, II |
| STORM SMART BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. |
| 23-13500 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Tommy D. Lay, II v. Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellee Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. [Entered: 12/22/2023 12:16 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File CIP Out of Time filed by Appellee Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc. is GRANTED by clerk [ # 12 ]. [Entered: 12/22/2023 12:13 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for extension of time to file Certificate of Interested Persons to 12/15/2023 filed by Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. Motion is Opposed. [12] [23-13500] (ECF: Suzanne Boy) [Entered: 12/15/2023 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 11 Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Suzanne M. Boy for Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. Document filed without leave of the Court. Counsel must promptly file a Motion to File Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement (CIP) Out of Time. See deficiency notice issued on 12/08/2023 at DE #9. [Entered: 12/11/2023 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Suzanne M. Boy for Appellee Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13500] (ECF: Suzanne Boy) [Entered: 12/11/2023 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 **2nd**NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Suzanne M. Boy for Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 12/08/2023 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Suzanne M. Boy for Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/29/2023 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 8 Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Tommy D. Lay, II. [Entered: 12/04/2023 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Tommy D. Lay, II. [Entered: 11/13/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file a Transcript Order Form to 12/11/2023, for extension of time to file appellants brief to 12/11/2023 filed by Appellant Tommy D. Lay, II. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 11/29/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Tommy D. Lay, II. [Entered: 11/16/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Suzanne M. Boy for Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-13500] (ECF: Suzanne Boy) [Entered: 11/08/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Tommy D. Lay, II. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 11/08/2023 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tommy D. Lay, II on 10/23/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/07/2023 as to Appellant Tommy D. Lay II. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/21/2023 as to Appellee Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc. [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tommy Lay, II v. Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: TOMMY D. LAY, II | |
| Represented By: | Tommy D. Lay II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STORM SMART BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Suzanne M. Boy |
| Represented By: | Katherine E. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
