David Stephens v. Ricky Dixon, et al
| DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS |
| RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacities and RANDALL POLK, Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution, Individual and Official Capacities |
| 23-13699 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice of Change of Address for Party David Terrence Stephens. [Entered: 01/04/2024 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 7 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant David Terrence Stephens. Motion to supplement the mailbox rule [ # 6 ].; Motion to the court on disciplinary and judication [ # 5 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure and the dismissal deficiency has not been cured. [Entered: 12/28/2023 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to supplement the mailbox rule filed by Appellant David Terrence Stephens. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 12/28/2023 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to the court on disciplinary and judication filed by Appellant David Terrence Stephens. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 12/28/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address for Party David Terrence Stephens. [Entered: 12/28/2023 09:42 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Terrence Stephens has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 12/05/2023 11:24 AM]
|
| Filing 2 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 11/09/2023. Docket Entry 9. [Entered: 11/15/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Terrence Stephens on 11/06/2023. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 11/15/2023 07:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Stephens v. Ricky Dixon, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS | |
| Represented By: | David Terrence Stephens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RANDALL POLK, Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution, Individual and Official Capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
