National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Case Number: 23-13730
Filed: November 13, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Morgan E. Rehrig for United States Postal Service Related cases? No. [23-13730] (ECF: Morgan Rehrig) [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:58 PM]
November 15, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Morgan Rehrig for United States Postal Service. Parties represented must be listed on the lines provided on the form. [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:39 PM]
November 15, 2023 Filing 6 ***NO ACTION TAKEN, see deficiency notice from 11/15/2023*** APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Morgan E. Rehrig for United States Postal Service Related cases? No. [23-13730]--[Edited 11/15/2023 by KJK] (ECF: Morgan Rehrig) [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:13 PM]
November 14, 2023 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ruth E. Burdick for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13730] (ECF: Ruth Burdick) [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:09 PM]
November 14, 2023 Filing 4 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Ruth E. Burdick for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. Related cases? No. [23-13730] (ECF: Ruth Burdick) [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:07 PM]
November 14, 2023 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ruth E. Burdick for National Labor Relations Board. Related cases? No. [23-13730] (ECF: Ruth Burdick) [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:05 PM]
November 13, 2023 Filing 2 Administrative record filed as to National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/14/2023 11:05 AM]
November 13, 2023 Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT DOCKETED. Application for Consent Judgment filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 11/14/2023 10:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Represented By: Ruth E. Burdick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Represented By: Morgan Elizabeth Rehrig
Represented By: Austin D. Black
Represented By: James C. Colling
Represented By: Jennifer A. Keams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SERVICE
Represented By: David Cohen
Represented By: Deva Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?