Frantz Germain v. State of California, et al
| FRANTZ GERMAIN |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMISSIONER OF PLACER COUNTY, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and EDWARD MISLEH |
| 23-13812 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Frantz Germain v. State of California, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Frantz Germain failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 01/18/2024 11:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
Judgment entered as to Appellant Frantz Germain. [Entered: 12/28/2023 11:36 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Frantz Germain. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 12/28/2023 11:35 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Frantz Germain. Motion Out of Time Certificate of Interested Person[ # 6 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 12/27/2023 08:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION filed by Frantz Germain. Motion is Unopposed. [6] [23-13812] (ECF: Frantz Germain) [Entered: 12/21/2023 09:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
No Action Taken Certificate of Interested Persons filed as to Party Frantz Germain. [23-13812]--[Edited 12/27/2023 by DCB] (ECF: Frantz Germain) [Entered: 12/21/2023 08:22 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Candace Phillips for The State Bar of California. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 12/20/2023 08:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Candace Phillips for The State Bar of California. Related cases? No. [23-13812] (ECF: Candace Phillips) [Entered: 12/07/2023 03:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Frantz Germain. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 12/07/2023 11:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Frantz Germain on 11/02/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/05/2023 as to Appellant Frantz Germain. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/19/2023 as to Appellees Edward Misleh and State of California [Entered: 11/21/2023 03:11 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
