Diana Lugo v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
| DIANA Y. LUGO |
| BIRMINGHAM JEFFERSON COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| 23-13904 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Diana Lugo v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Diana Y. Lugo DE #: 86 [Entered: 12/21/2023 12:06 PM] |
| USDC Clerk is requested to forward the following documents to our court: DE 102. Any exhibits identified in 11th Cir. R. 11-3, such as child pornography, should not be transmitted. Please notify the Clerk's Office of any exhibits which are not transmitted to the Court of Appeals. [Entered: 12/21/2023 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Timothy P. Donahue, Sr. for Appellee Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13904] (ECF: Timothy Donahue) [Entered: 12/20/2023 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice of receipt: Letter and Proof of USDC Filings as to Appellant Diana Y. Lugo.. [Entered: 12/20/2023 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Timothy P. Donahue, Sr. for Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority. Related cases? No. [23-13904] (ECF: Timothy Donahue) [Entered: 12/15/2023 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice of Mandatory ECF sent to Diana Y. Lugo. [Entered: 12/20/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Diana Y. Lugo. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 12/20/2023 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Diana Y. Lugo. [Entered: 12/20/2023 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 *ERROR* USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Diana Yazmin Lugo was filed on 11/21/2023. Docket Entry 96. [Entered: 12/01/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Diana Yazmin Lugo on 11/20/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/15/2023 as to Appellant Diana Yazmin Lugo. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/29/2023 as to Appellee Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority [Entered: 12/01/2023 03:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Diana Lugo v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DIANA Y. LUGO | |
| Represented By: | Diana Y. Lugo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: BIRMINGHAM JEFFERSON COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Timothy P. Donahue Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
