USA v. Tyrell Dukes
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TYRELL DUKES |
| 23-14025 |
| December 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Tyrell Dukes, Court Reporter: Dawn M. Savino, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 11/21/2023 , Plea Hearing 08/10/2023. [Entered: 12/14/2023 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Eboni Blenman for Appellant Tyrell Dukes. Transcript(s) ordered. [23-14025] (ECF: Eboni Blenman) [Entered: 12/14/2023 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Eboni Blenman for Appellant Tyrell Dukes. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-14025] (ECF: Eboni Blenman) [Entered: 12/14/2023 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Caruso for Appellant Related cases? No. [23-14025] (ECF: Michael Caruso) [Entered: 12/13/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Eboni Blenman for Tyrell Dukes. Related cases? No. [23-14025] (ECF: Eboni Blenman) [Entered: 12/13/2023 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tyrell Dukes on 12/08/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 12/13/2023 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
