David Stokes v. USA
Petitioner: DAVID DONNEL STOKES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 23-14146
Filed: December 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Donnel Stokes failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 02/02/2024 11:12 AM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to David Donnel Stokes. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 01/18/2024 12:20 PM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 5 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant David Donnel Stokes. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 01/18/2024 12:18 PM]
January 8, 2024 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Matzkin for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-14146] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 01/08/2024 10:20 AM]
December 29, 2023 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Matzkin for USA Related cases? No. [23-14146] (ECF: Daniel Matzkin) [Entered: 12/29/2023 02:33 PM]
December 28, 2023 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant David Donnel Stokes was filed on 11/29/2023. Docket Entry 16. [Entered: 12/28/2023 02:57 PM]
December 21, 2023 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Donnel Stokes on 12/20/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 12/28/2023 02:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Stokes v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DAVID DONNEL STOKES
Represented By: David Donnel Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: Daniel Matzkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?