Ferrell Walker v. USA
| FERRELL WALKER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-10077 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of receipt: IFP Motion as to Appellant Ferrell Walker. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This motion has already been submitted and is pending with the court. [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ferrell Walker. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 02/14/2024 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Ferrell Walker. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 7 ]., Motion to proceed IFP. Filing Fee or IFP needs to first be filed in District Court. [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ferrell Walker. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Stuart E. Walker for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10077] (ECF: Stuart Walker) [Entered: 01/30/2024 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Ferrell Walker. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ferrell Walker.***PRO SE CIP TIMELY FILED*** [Entered: 01/30/2024 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 ***ERROR-CIP TIMELY FILED***NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Ferrell Walker. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 01/29/2024 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stuart E. Walker for USA Related cases? No. [24-10077] (ECF: Stuart Walker) [Entered: 01/24/2024 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Ferrell Walker was filed on 12/01/2023. Docket Entry 97. [Entered: 01/11/2024 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ferrell Walker on 01/03/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/11/2024 12:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ferrell Walker v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FERRELL WALKER | |
| Represented By: | Ferrell Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Georgia |
| Represented By: | Stuart E. Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
